How Ian Macdonald voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow certain types of stem cell research, including human embryo research

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stem cell research” which Ian Macdonald could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ian Macdonald on this policy.

Division Ian Macdonald Supporters vote

7th Nov 2006, 8:53 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time

absent Yes

7th Nov 2006, 1:10 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stem cell research” which Ian Macdonald could have attended.

Division Ian Macdonald Supporters vote

7th Nov 2006, 5:33 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - National Stem Cell Bank

absent Yes

7th Nov 2006, 5:22 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - Deposit of stem cell samples

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ian Macdonald was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.