Compare how Ian Macdonald and Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted on increasing investment in the coal industry

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Ian Macdonald or Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ian Macdonald and Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Ian Macdonald Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Ian Macdonald or Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Ian Macdonald Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote

4th Dec 2018, 6:19 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - Coal exports

No - No

4th Dec 2018, 4:42 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Support Adani

absent - Yes

27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment

absent - No

26th Nov 2018, 5:20 PM – Senate Motions - Coal-Fired Power Stations - Good for economy and regional jobs

Yes - Yes

27th Jun 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - More coal-fired power stations

absent - Yes

19th Mar 2018, 1:16 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Junior Minerals Exploration Incentive) Bill 2017 - in Committee - No exploration incentive for thermal coal

No - No

13th Sep 2017, 5:38 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Transition for coal workforce required

No No No

11th Sep 2017 – Senate Motions - Energy - Liddell power station

absent No No

16th Aug 2017, 12:16 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Stop Adani mine

No absent No

22nd Mar 2017, 5:05 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Transition plan for coal workers

No Yes No

1st Dec 2016, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Industry - For technology neutral policies

Yes absent Yes

17th Mar 2016, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Support a rapid transition to clean energy

No - No

10th Nov 2015, 3:55 PM – Senate Business - Coalmining - Oppose Shenhua Watermark coal mine

absent - No

9th Sep 2015, 4:28 PM – Senate Motions - Newcastle City Council Investment Policies - Environmental investment

absent - No

25th Mar 2015, 5:25 PM – Senate Business - Great Barrier Reef - Galilee Basin

No - No

3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains

No - No

24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin

No - No

28th Oct 2014, 4:07 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Acknowledge massive economic benefits

absent - Yes

15th Mar 2012, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Coal - From coal to clean energy market

absent - No

10th Sep 2009, 9:41 AM – Senate Motions - Coal Exploration and Mining in the Galilee Basin - Concerns

absent - No

8th Feb 2007, 10:57 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reduce coal exports

absent - No