We can't say anything concrete about how Gerard Rennick voted on climate change inaction
How Gerard Rennick voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should do nothing to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Gerard Rennick could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gerard Rennick on this policy.
| Division | Gerard Rennick | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Gerard Rennick could have attended.
| Division | Gerard Rennick | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Aug 2023, 4:12 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - "Fearmongering" |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Gerard Rennick was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.