Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.

Division	George Brandis	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which George Brandis could have attended.

Division	George Brandis	Supporters vote
13th Oct 2015, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement	absent	Yes
26th Mar 2015, 1:26 PM – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Undertake a cost benefit analysis	absent	Yes
11th Feb 2015, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions — Request for more transparency in Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.	absent	Yes
29th Oct 2014 – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Give members of Parliament access to the draft text	absent	Yes
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.