We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on deregulating undergraduate university fees
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should remove limits on the amount that universities can charge students for tuition in Commonwealth Supported Places (CSPs)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for deregulating undergraduate university fees” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2015, 6:43 PM – Senate Higher Education and Research Reform Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
2nd Dec 2014, 5:58 PM – Senate Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for deregulating undergraduate university fees” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.