We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on decreasing ABC and SBS funding
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease funding for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2017, 10:20 PM – Senate Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017, Commercial Broadcasting (Tax) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Against non-statutory review |
absent | No |
10th May 2017, 5:41 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Reduce funding |
absent | Yes |
29th Nov 2016, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Opposes cuts |
absent | No |
24th Jun 2015, 12:20 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Sbs Advertising Flexibility and Other Measures) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree to bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2014, 4:38 PM – Senate Motions - ABC and SBS - Against budget cuts |
absent | No |
18th Jun 2013, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Public Broadcasting - Properly fund ABC and SBS |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
George Brandis has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.