We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
absent | No |
17th Jul 2014, 4:57 PM – Senate Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014 and Asset Recycling Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014 — In Committee — Toll roads |
absent | No |
27th Jun 2013, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions — Infrastructure and Transport Funding: Roe Highway - Do not fund |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.