We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should work to address homelessness in specific vulnerable groups, such as older women and First Nations people
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2017, 4:44 PM – Senate Motions - Older People and Homelessness - Increase funding |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2017, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Homelessness - LGBTIQ community |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.