We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on reducing air pollution
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop policies and legislation that reduce air pollution, including vehicle emissions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Apr 2016, 6:49 PM – Senate Motions - Public Transport - Prioritise funding |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.