We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on privatising certain government services
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the private sector control over running and managing some of its services (such as public welfare, aged care and visa services) by either outsourcing or privatisation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Oct 2017, 2:02 PM – Senate Motions - Department of Human Services - Staffing |
absent | No |
13th Oct 2016, 1:57 PM – Senate National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - in Committee - Protection of private data |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.