We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on increasing access to medicinal cannabis products
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that terminally ill people should be able to access medicinal cannabis products
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Jun 2017, 1:10 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
11th May 2017 – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Jun 2017, 1:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Vote on disallowance again |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.