How George Brandis voted compared to someone who believes that terminally ill people should be able to access medicinal cannabis products

Division George Brandis Supporters vote Division outcome

13th Jun 2017, 1:10 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow

Show detail

The majority voted in favour of a motion to disallow the Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016, which means that Regulation no longer has legal force. The motion was introduced by Greens Senator Richard Di Natale.

What was the motion about?

The motion to disallow the Regulation was introduced in order to restore the ability of terminally ill patients to access medicinal cannabis products. Read more about the regulation in its explanatory memorandum and the arguments for its disallowance in the debate.

absent Yes (strong) Passed by a small majority

13th Jun 2017, 1:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Vote on disallowance again

Show detail

The majority voted in favour of a motion that the vote on whether to disallow the Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 should be voted on again. This means that that vote can now take place again.

What was the vote?

Senator Di Natale explains what this disallowance would restore the ability of terminally ill patients to access medicinal cannabis products. Read more about the regulation in its explanatory memorandum and the arguments for its disallowance in the debate.

absent Yes Passed by a small majority

11th May 2017 – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow

Show detail

The same number of senators voted for and against a motion to disallow parts of the Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016, which means the motion was unsuccessful. It was introduced by Greens Senator Richard Di Natale.

What was the motion about?

The motion was to disallow parts of the Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016. If successful, it would have meant that those parts no longer had legal force.

Its purpose was to restore the ability of terminally ill patients to access medicinal cannabis products. Read more about the regulation in its explanatory memorandum and the arguments for its disallowance in the debate.

Motion text

That items 1 and 4 of Schedule 1 of the Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 and made under the Crimes Act 1914 and the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, be disallowed.

absent Yes (strong) Not passed

How "never voted" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete other than that they have "never voted" on this policy.