We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on increasing housing affordability
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take national action to increase housing affordability so that all Australians have the chance to buy their own home
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing housing affordability” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing housing affordability” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2016, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Housing Affordability - Negative gearing & capital gains tax discount |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2015, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Housing Affordability - First home buyers and public housing |
absent | Yes |
18th Sep 2007, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Housing Affordability - Evidence-based national plan |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.