We can't say anything concrete about how George Brandis voted on federal action on public housing
How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that even though public housing is controlled by our state governments, the federal government should also take action to increase the availability of affordable public housing around Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which George Brandis could have attended.
| Division | George Brandis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2017, 4:44 PM – Senate Motions - Older People and Homelessness - Increase funding |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2017, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Homelessness - LGBTIQ community |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2015, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Housing Affordability - First home buyers and public housing |
absent | Yes |
15th Jul 2014, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Affordable Housing - Increase funding for affordable public housing |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.