We can't say anything concrete about how Fraser Anning voted on increasing the Youth Allowance rate
How Fraser Anning voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the Youth Allowance rate to ensure that it covers basic living costs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Youth Allowance rate” which Fraser Anning could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning on this policy.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Youth Allowance rate” which Fraser Anning could have attended.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 4:57 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Poverty Week - Increase Newstart & Youth Allowance |
absent | Yes |
20th Jun 2018, 11:40 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Raise minimum wage, Newstart and Youth Allowance |
absent | Yes |
10th May 2018, 12:10 PM – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Increase single rate of Newstart and Youth Allowance |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fraser Anning was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.