How Fraser Anning voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Fraser Anning could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning on this policy.

Division Fraser Anning Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Fraser Anning could have attended.

Division Fraser Anning Supporters vote

3rd Dec 2018, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Gender and Sexual Orientation - Healthcare and gender diverse treatment

absent Yes

16th Aug 2018, 12:37 PM – Senate Motions - Free Speech - Against gender neutral language

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fraser Anning was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.