We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Ketter voted on revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister
How Chris Ketter voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the immigration minister the power to revoke the citizenship of people who have dual nationality (that is, are also citizens of another country) if they take part in certain terrorism-related offences
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister” which Chris Ketter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ketter on this policy.
| Division | Chris Ketter | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Dec 2015, 9:01 PM – Senate Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister” which Chris Ketter could have attended.
| Division | Chris Ketter | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Ketter was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.