We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Ketter voted on protecting whales within Australian waters
How Chris Ketter voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should protect whales within Australian waters by, for example, taking action against the Japanese Government over its whaling program in the Southern Ocean
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting whales within Australian waters” which Chris Ketter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ketter on this policy.
| Division | Chris Ketter | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting whales within Australian waters” which Chris Ketter could have attended.
| Division | Chris Ketter | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Sep 2018, 4:45 PM – Senate Motions - Whaling - Patrol against + investigate legal options |
absent | Yes |
27th Mar 2018, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Seismic testing in the Great Australian Bight |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Ketter was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.