We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Ketter voted on Australia's timber industry
How Chris Ketter voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect Australia's logging industry and the jobs it represents
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which Chris Ketter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ketter on this policy.
| Division | Chris Ketter | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which Chris Ketter could have attended.
| Division | Chris Ketter | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Aug 2015 – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Timber Industry - Support |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Ketter has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.