Compare how Chris Ketter and David Leyonhjelm voted on increasing funding for legal aid

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which either Chris Ketter or David Leyonhjelm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ketter and David Leyonhjelm on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Chris Ketter	David Leyonhjelm	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which either Chris Ketter or David Leyonhjelm could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Chris Ketter	David Leyonhjelm	Supporters vote
29th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Services - Commit funding	Yes	No	Yes
26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding	No	No	Yes