Compare how Chris Ketter and Kate Lundy voted on increasing investment in the coal industry

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Chris Ketter or Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ketter and Kate Lundy on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Chris Ketter	Kate Lundy	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Chris Ketter or Kate Lundy could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Chris Ketter	Kate Lundy	Supporters vote
4th Dec 2018, 6:19 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - Coal exports	absent	-	No
4th Dec 2018, 4:42 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Support Adani	absent	-	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment	absent	-	No
26th Nov 2018, 5:20 PM – Senate Motions - Coal-Fired Power Stations - Good for economy and regional jobs	No	-	Yes
27th Jun 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - More coal-fired power stations	No	-	Yes
19th Mar 2018, 1:16 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Junior Minerals Exploration Incentive) Bill 2017 - in Committee - No exploration incentive for thermal coal	No	-	No
13th Sep 2017, 5:38 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Transition for coal workforce required	No	-	No
11th Sep 2017 – Senate Motions - Energy - Liddell power station	No	-	No
16th Aug 2017, 12:16 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Stop Adani mine	No	-	No
22nd Mar 2017, 5:05 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Transition plan for coal workers	Yes	-	No
1st Dec 2016, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Industry - For technology neutral policies	No	-	Yes
17th Mar 2016, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Support a rapid transition to clean energy	No	-	No
10th Nov 2015, 3:55 PM – Senate Business - Coalmining - Oppose Shenhua Watermark coal mine	No	-	No
9th Sep 2015, 4:28 PM – Senate Motions - Newcastle City Council Investment Policies - Environmental investment	No	-	No
25th Mar 2015, 5:25 PM – Senate Business - Great Barrier Reef - Galilee Basin	No	-	No
3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains	No	No	No
24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin	No	absent	No
28th Oct 2014, 4:07 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Acknowledge massive economic benefits	Yes	absent	Yes
15th Mar 2012, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Coal - From coal to clean energy market	-	No	No
10th Sep 2009, 9:41 AM – Senate Motions - Coal Exploration and Mining in the Galilee Basin - Concerns	-	No	No
8th Feb 2007, 10:57 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reduce coal exports	-	No	No