We can't say anything concrete about how Barry O'Sullivan voted on decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels
How Barry O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the subsidisation of taxpayer money into fossil fuels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Barry O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barry O'Sullivan on this policy.
Division | Barry O'Sullivan | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Barry O'Sullivan could have attended.
Division | Barry O'Sullivan | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
12th Nov 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - OECD Coal Subsidies - Exclude dirtiest coal fired power stations |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Barry O'Sullivan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.