We can't say anything concrete about how Barry O'Sullivan voted on stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years
How Barry O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should tighten the ministerial code of conduct to stop former ministers from taking up lobbying positions - including in-house positions - within five years of leaving Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Barry O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barry O'Sullivan on this policy.
| Division | Barry O'Sullivan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Barry O'Sullivan could have attended.
| Division | Barry O'Sullivan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Sep 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist" |
absent | Yes |
19th Sep 2018, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist" |
absent | Yes |
18th Sep 2018, 4:58 PM – Senate Motions - Ministerial Conduct - Tighten |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Barry O'Sullivan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.