We can't say anything concrete about how Barry O'Sullivan voted on ending immigration detention on Manus Island
How Barry O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Manus Regional Processing Centre and stop all Manus-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Barry O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barry O'Sullivan on this policy.
| Division | Barry O'Sullivan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Barry O'Sullivan could have attended.
| Division | Barry O'Sullivan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Feb 2018, 11:56 AM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - End offshore detention |
No | Yes |
20th Jun 2017, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Close Nauru and Manus Is. detention centres |
absent | Yes |
25th Jun 2015, 6:15 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Regional Processing Arrangements) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Barry O'Sullivan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.