We can't say anything concrete about how Anthony Chisholm voted on treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency
How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should treat the COVID-19 vaccination as a matter of urgency and ensure that Australians are being vaccinated as fast as possible, starting with essential workers such as staff working in hospitals and aged care facilities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2021, 1:58 PM – Senate Covid-19 Disaster Payment (Funding Arrangements) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Quarantine and vaccine rollout |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2021, 10:35 AM – Senate Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment (Royal Commission Response No. 1) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Vaccinate aged care workers |
absent | Yes |
21st Jun 2021, 4:44 PM – Senate Motions - Covid-19 - Quarantine facilities and vaccine rollout |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Chisholm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.