Show detail
The same number of senators voted for and against a motion introduced by Tasmanian Senator Anne Urquhart (Labor), which means it failed.
Motion text
That the Senate—
(a) notes that:
(i) Murdoch University has proposed to cut its Indonesian language courses in 2021,
(ii) Latrobe University has proposed to cut its Indonesian and Hindi language courses in 2021,
(iii) Swinburne University has proposed to cut its entire language program, including Japanese and Mandarin in 2021, and
(iv) these cuts will reduce the number of Australian university students studying Asian languages for years to come, and are a result of the Government's tertiary funding cuts;
(b) further notes that:
(i) increasing Australia's Asia capability, including through the study of languages, is vital for Australia to engage with the Indo-Pacific region and support our economic recovery, and
(ii) the study of Asian languages is important for strengthening the people-to-people links that will be critical in diversifying Australia's economic relationships in the Indo-Pacific region; and
(c) calls on the Australian Government to take urgent steps to:
(i) make the study of Asian languages a national priority, and
(ii) properly fund universities.
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Not passed
|
Show detail
The majority voted in favour of passing the bill in the Senate. In other words, they voted to read the bill for a third time. Because new amendments were agreed to in the Senate, the bill needs to return to the House of Representatives for a final time before it can become law.
What does the bill do?
This bill will implement part of the government's Job Ready Graduates Package and includes major proposed higher education funding changes, including how the government currently subsidises university tuition costs.
If successful in its current form, the bill will decrease the subsidy for most areas of the humanities and social science as well as in engineering, science, surveying, environmental studies and other areas. On the other hand, it will increase the subsidy for most health fields, education, mathematics and other areas. At the same time, the bill will set new maximum student contribution amounts, which means the degree costs for students are going to change significantly. Humanities, law and commerce degrees are going to increase in price while mathematics, agriculture and certain science degrees will decrease.
Sometimes, such as in the case of engineering, the changes appear somewhat contradictory: both the subsidy for engineering and the maximum student contribution rate is being reduced. According to Science and Technology Australia ("STA"):
...the proposed reduction of funding could risk the teaching of engineering especially at smaller or regional universities. The impact of the funding changes would also be particularly acute in the ‘heavy engineering’ disciplines – the teaching of which often involves expensive large-scale facilities and infrastructure. This affects fields such as mining engineering, petrochemical engineering, electrical engineering, heavy mechanical engineering and advanced manufacturing.
The most significant change will be in the cost of humanities degrees, which will go from being one of the cheapest subject areas to one of the most expensive.
According to the bills digest:
Analysis from the Centre for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne has estimated the overall impact of the proposed change:
University revenue for teaching would be reduced by nearly one billion dollars in 2021 and every year thereafter for the same domestic student load as in 2018 as a result of the funding caps imposed in 2018 and the 2021 funding cluster changes in Job-ready Graduates
In other words, the overall affect of the bill appears to be a reduction in government funding for the university sector.
Read more about the bill in the bills digest.
|
absent
|
No (strong)
|
Passed by a small majority
|
Show detail
The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the remaining stages of this bill, subject to a request. In other words, the senators voted that they agreed to the bill as amended. If the House of Representatives agrees with the request - that is, the Senate amendments - then the bill will return to the Senate for a final vote before becoming law.
What does the bill do?
This bill will implement part of the government's Job Ready Graduates Package and includes major proposed higher education funding changes, including how the government currently subsidises university tuition costs.
If successful in its current form, the bill will decrease the subsidy for most areas of the humanities and social science as well as in engineering, science, surveying, environmental studies and other areas. On the other hand, it will increase the subsidy for most health fields, education, mathematics and other areas. At the same time, the bill will set new maximum student contribution amounts, which means the degree costs for students are going to change significantly. Humanities, law and commerce degrees are going to increase in price while mathematics, agriculture and certain science degrees will decrease.
Sometimes, such as in the case of engineering, the changes appear somewhat contradictory: both the subsidy for engineering and the maximum student contribution rate is being reduced. According to Science and Technology Australia ("STA"):
...the proposed reduction of funding could risk the teaching of engineering especially at smaller or regional universities. The impact of the funding changes would also be particularly acute in the ‘heavy engineering’ disciplines – the teaching of which often involves expensive large-scale facilities and infrastructure. This affects fields such as mining engineering, petrochemical engineering, electrical engineering, heavy mechanical engineering and advanced manufacturing.
The most significant change will be in the cost of humanities degrees, which will go from being one of the cheapest subject areas to one of the most expensive.
According to the bills digest:
Analysis from the Centre for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne has estimated the overall impact of the proposed change:
University revenue for teaching would be reduced by nearly one billion dollars in 2021 and every year thereafter for the same domestic student load as in 2018 as a result of the funding caps imposed in 2018 and the 2021 funding cluster changes in Job-ready Graduates
In other words, the overall affect of the bill appears to be a reduction in government funding for the university sector.
Read more about the bill in the bills digest.
|
No
|
No (strong)
|
Passed by a small majority
|
Show detail
The majority voted to agree with the main idea of the bill. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to give the bill a second reading. This means they can now discuss it in more detail.
What is the main idea of the bill?
This bill will implement part of the government's Job Ready Graduates Package and includes major proposed higher education funding changes, including how the government currently subsidises university tuition costs.
If successful in its current form, the bill will decrease the subsidy for most areas of the humanities and social science as well as in engineering, science, surveying, environmental studies and other areas. On the other hand, it will increase the subsidy for most health fields, education, mathematics and other areas. At the same time, the bill will set new maximum student contribution amounts, which means the degree costs for students are going to change significantly. Humanities, law and commerce degrees are going to increase in price while mathematics, agriculture and certain science degrees will decrease.
Sometimes, such as in the case of engineering, the changes appear somewhat contradictory: both the subsidy for engineering and the maximum student contribution rate is being reduced. According to Science and Technology Australia ("STA"):
...the proposed reduction of funding could risk the teaching of engineering especially at smaller or regional universities. The impact of the funding changes would also be particularly acute in the ‘heavy engineering’ disciplines – the teaching of which often involves expensive large-scale facilities and infrastructure. This affects fields such as mining engineering, petrochemical engineering, electrical engineering, heavy mechanical engineering and advanced manufacturing.
The most significant change will be in the cost of humanities degrees, which will go from being one of the cheapest subject areas to one of the most expensive.
According to the bills digest:
Analysis from the Centre for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne has estimated the overall impact of the proposed change:
University revenue for teaching would be reduced by nearly one billion dollars in 2021 and every year thereafter for the same domestic student load as in 2018 as a result of the funding caps imposed in 2018 and the 2021 funding cluster changes in Job-ready Graduates
In other words, the overall affect of the bill appears to be a reduction in government funding for the university sector.
Read more about the bill in the bills digest.
|
No
|
No (strong)
|
Passed by a small majority
|
Show detail
The majority voted in favour of a motion that schedule 2 of the Emergency Response Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2019 stand as printed. In other words, they wanted to keep that schedule unchanged.
What is Schedule 2?
Schedule 2 abolishes the Education Investment Fund ("EIF"). According to the bills digest:
The EIF was established on 1 January 2009 by section 131 of the Nation-building Funds Act 2008 (NBF Act), to provide dedicated ongoing capital funding for tertiary education and research infrastructure, including for universities, vocational education and training providers and other non-university organisations.
The EIF was intended to provide a large-scale funding source for transformational projects which would allow Australian research and tertiary education institutions to compete effectively with international counterparts.
Unlike many other tertiary education infrastructure funding programs, the EIF was not limited to supporting research infrastructure, but instead funded a wide range of investments, including learning and teaching spaces.
|
absent
|
No (strong)
|
Passed by a large majority
|
Show detail
The majority voted against a motion introduced by Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, which means it was unsuccessful.
Motion text
At the end of the motion, add:
, but the Senate rejects the slashing of more than $514 million from higher education programs and support for students as inappropriate saving measures that will hurt Australian students and universities and damage Australia's international reputation as an innovative leader in education.
|
absent
|
Yes
|
Not passed by a modest majority
|