How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have enough independence so that they can carry out their duties in relation to politically sensitive matters

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent Australian Federal Police” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.

Division Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent Australian Federal Police” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.

Division Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote

23rd Jul 2019, 3:46 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Chisholm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.