We can't say anything concrete about how Anthony Chisholm voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2024, 6:08 PM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 5) 2023-2024 and four others - Second Reading - Increase funding for legal assistance services |
absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Services - Commit funding |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Anthony Chisholm has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.