Compare how Anthony Chisholm and Patrick Dodson voted on requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements” which either Anthony Chisholm or Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm and Patrick Dodson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Patrick Dodson	Supporters vote
13th Jun 2017, 7:26 PM – Senate Native Title Amendment (Indigenous Land Use Agreements) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements” which either Anthony Chisholm or Patrick Dodson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Patrick Dodson	Supporters vote
no votes listed