Compare how Anthony Chisholm and Sarah Henderson voted on increasing protections for franchisees

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protections for franchisees” which either Anthony Chisholm or Sarah Henderson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm and Sarah Henderson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Sarah Henderson	Supporters vote
22nd Feb 2021, 12:49 PM – Senate Franchising Laws Amendment (Fairness in Franchising) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	No	Yes
22nd Feb 2021, 12:41 PM – Senate Franchising Laws Amendment (Fairness in Franchising) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protections for franchisees” which either Anthony Chisholm or Sarah Henderson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Sarah Henderson	Supporters vote
no votes listed