Compare how Anthony Chisholm and Zed Seselja voted on banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which either Anthony Chisholm or Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm and Zed Seselja on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Zed Seselja	Supporters vote
6th Dec 2018, 3:52 PM – Senate Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Prohibiting items in immigration detention facilities (including mobile phones)	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which either Anthony Chisholm or Zed Seselja could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Zed Seselja	Supporters vote
no votes listed