Compare how Anthony Chisholm and David Smith voted on the use of strong encryption technologies

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which either Anthony Chisholm or David Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm and David Smith on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	David Smith	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which either Anthony Chisholm or David Smith could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	David Smith	Supporters vote
6th Dec 2018, 7:22 PM – Senate Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	Yes	No
6th Dec 2018, 7:09 PM – Senate Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	No
15th Aug 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Warrant and privacy	No	No	Yes