We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Bartlett voted on federal action on public housing
How Andrew Bartlett voted compared to someone who agrees that even though public housing is controlled by our state governments, the federal government should also take action to increase the availability of affordable public housing around Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which Andrew Bartlett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Bartlett on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Bartlett | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which Andrew Bartlett could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Bartlett | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2018, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Social Housing - Reject charging market rates |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2017, 4:44 PM – Senate Motions - Older People and Homelessness - Increase funding |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Andrew Bartlett has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.