How Amanda Stoker voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that Australian laws protect the reproductive bodily autonomy of women and other people capable of childbearing by, for example, protecting them from pregnancy-related discrimination and ensuring they have access to pregnancy-related healthcare services, which include affordable contraception, maternity care and abortion services

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which Amanda Stoker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Stoker on this policy.

Division Amanda Stoker Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which Amanda Stoker could have attended.

Division Amanda Stoker Supporters vote

16th Oct 2019 – Senate Motions - Abortion - Congratulate NSW

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Amanda Stoker has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.