Compare how Amanda Stoker and Rachel Siewert voted on no new fossil fuels projects

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which either Amanda Stoker or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Stoker and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Amanda Stoker	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which either Amanda Stoker or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Amanda Stoker	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
13th May 2021, 2:48 PM – Senate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment (Extension and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - New fossil fuel projects	No	Yes	Yes
16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects	No	Yes	Yes
9th Sep 2019, 4:55 PM – Senate Motions - Fossil Fuel Basins - Halt development	No	Yes	Yes