Compare how Trish Crossin and Lin Thorp voted on increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management
Trish Crossin
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for NT June 1998 – September 2013
Lin Thorp
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for Tasmania June 2012 – June 2014
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that there should be more independent access to detention centres and more information provided about the management of asylum seekers under Australian government policy, including the interception of boats at sea
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which either Trish Crossin or Lin Thorp could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Trish Crossin and Lin Thorp on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Trish Crossin | Lin Thorp | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
16th May 2013, 11:28 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Media access |
No | No | Yes |
16th May 2013, 11:06 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - In Committee - AHRC access |
No | absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2012, 9:09 PM – Senate Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Independent annual review |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which either Trish Crossin or Lin Thorp could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".