We can't say anything concrete about how Sam McMahon voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
How Sam McMahon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which Sam McMahon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon on this policy.
| Division | Sam McMahon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Feb 2021, 9:40 PM – Senate Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
17th Feb 2021, 7:13 PM – Senate Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which Sam McMahon could have attended.
| Division | Sam McMahon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sam McMahon was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.