Compare how Sam McMahon and Rachel Siewert voted on the Paris Climate Agreement

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which either Sam McMahon or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which either Sam McMahon or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
3rd Dec 2020, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Kyoto carryover credits	No	Yes	Yes
16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects	No	Yes	Yes
16th Oct 2019, 4:35 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address and adapt	No	Yes	Yes
16th Oct 2019, 4:12 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address	No	Yes	Yes
4th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM – Senate Documents - Climate Change - Withdraw from Paris Climate Accord	-	No	No
14th Aug 2018, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Withdraw	-	No	No