Compare how Sam McMahon and James Paterson voted on extending Jobkeeper Payment

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for extending Jobkeeper Payment” which either Sam McMahon or James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon and James Paterson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	James Paterson	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for extending Jobkeeper Payment” which either Sam McMahon or James Paterson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	James Paterson	Supporters vote
23rd Feb 2021, 4:57 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Arts and Entertainment Industry	No	No	Yes
18th Feb 2021, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions - Jobseeker Payment - Extend for tourism industry	absent	No	Yes
13th May 2020, 4:29 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Extend	No	No	Yes