Compare how Sam McMahon and Matthew Canavan voted on building community climate change resilience

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building community climate change resilience” which either Sam McMahon or Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon and Matthew Canavan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	Matthew Canavan	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building community climate change resilience” which either Sam McMahon or Matthew Canavan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	Matthew Canavan	Supporters vote
3rd Dec 2019, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Drought	No	No	Yes
13th Nov 2019, 4:49 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Bushfires - Climate Change	No	absent	Yes
17th Oct 2019, 10:51 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Invest	No	No	Yes
10th Sep 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland - Bushfires	No	No	Yes