Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.

Division	Nigel Scullion	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.

Division	Nigel Scullion	Supporters vote
6th Dec 2018, 7:22 PM – Senate Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	absent	No
6th Dec 2018, 7:09 PM – Senate Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	absent	No
15th Aug 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Warrant and privacy	absent	Yes
23rd Feb 2016, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Develop technology	absent	Yes
14th Nov 2013, 11:34 AM – Senate Motions - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Reference - Surveillance	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nigel Scullion was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.