We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make sure that a planned fleet of 12 new submarines is built in South Australia (this new fleet was proposed in 2013 to replace the existing Collins Class submarine fleet)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Nov 2014, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Censure the Minister for Defence |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nigel Scullion was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.