We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on increasing beef import standards
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the standards and assessment processes that protect the public and beef industry from diseases such as mad cow disease
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing beef import standards” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Mar 2010, 4:38 PM – Senate Food Importation (Bovine Meat Standards) Bill 2010 — Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
15th Mar 2010, 3:51 PM – Senate Food Importation (Bovine Meat Standards) Bill 2010 — Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing beef import standards” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nigel Scullion was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.