We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
absent | No |
17th Jul 2014, 4:57 PM – Senate Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014 and Asset Recycling Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014 — In Committee — Toll roads |
absent | No |
27th Jun 2013, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions — Infrastructure and Transport Funding: Roe Highway - Do not fund |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nigel Scullion has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.