We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on prioritising religious freedom
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect religious freedoms over other rights and freedoms (for example, by giving religious organisations the right to discriminate)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for prioritising religious freedom” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for prioritising religious freedom” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Day of the Unborn Child - Religious freedom |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2018, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Discrimination Laws - Protect students and staff at independent schools |
absent | No |
16th Oct 2018, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Religious Freedom Review - Discrimination against LGBTI students and staff |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nigel Scullion has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.