We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on a same-sex marriage plebiscite
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should hold a plebiscite (or national vote) on the question of whether the law should be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a same-sex marriage plebiscite” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Nov 2016, 9:33 PM – Senate Plebiscite (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a same-sex marriage plebiscite” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nigel Scullion was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.