We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on increasing the price of tobacco
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should improve the health of Australians by increasing the excise and excise equivalent customs duty on tobacco
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the price of tobacco” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Sep 2016, 7:10 PM – Senate Excise Tariff Amendment (Tobacco) Bill 2016, Customs Tariff Amendment (Tobacco) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the price of tobacco” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nigel Scullion was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.