We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency by creating a Foreign Ownership Register for Agricultural Land that is available for all citizens to access
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 5:06 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Investment - Limit foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
11th Sep 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Cubbie Station - Foreign investment |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nigel Scullion has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.