How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.

Division Nigel Scullion Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.

Division Nigel Scullion Supporters vote

29th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Services - Commit funding

No Yes

26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Nigel Scullion has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.