We can't say anything concrete about how Jacinta Nampijinpa Price voted on protecting whistleblowers
How Jacinta Nampijinpa Price voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to protect people who disclose information for the benefit of the public interest and protect the journalists who report it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Jacinta Nampijinpa Price could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price on this policy.
| Division | Jacinta Nampijinpa Price | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Jun 2023, 10:35 AM – Senate Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Meaning of public interest disclosure |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Jacinta Nampijinpa Price could have attended.
| Division | Jacinta Nampijinpa Price | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th May 2024, 7:26 PM – Senate Public Service Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Whistleblower protections |
absent | Yes |
15th Jun 2023, 11:04 AM – Senate Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Parliamentary staff |
absent | Yes |
10th May 2023, 11:33 AM – Senate Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Whistleblowers |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.