We can't say anything concrete about how Ursula Stephens voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure
How Ursula Stephens voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Ursula Stephens could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ursula Stephens on this policy.
| Division | Ursula Stephens | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Ursula Stephens could have attended.
| Division | Ursula Stephens | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Jun 2013, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions — Infrastructure and Transport Funding: Roe Highway - Do not fund |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ursula Stephens has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.